wp21d9248d.png
wp8cb272e8.png
wpda1f1be8.png

Journal of the Slovene Association of LSP Teachers

ISSN: 1854-2042

wp5c42bda1.png
wp5c42bda1.png

Scripta Manent: Testing and Assessment of Languages for Specific Purposes

Volume 4/1

 

 

Contents

 

wp00000000.png

© 2005-2008 Scripta Manent. Published by SDUTSJ. All Rights Reserved.   

 

Previous Volumes

 

» Volume 3/2

 

» Volume 3/1

 

» Volume 2/2

 

» Volume 2/1

 

» Volume 1/1

:: M. Djurić

:: A. Tratnik

 

:: M. Djurić

Editorial

HTML | PDF

 

 

Key Issues in Testing English for Specific Purposes

 

ABSTRACT: The article discusses some key issues surrounding testing of English for Specific Purposes (ESP), a wide-ranging field which has now been established as an integral part of English Language Testing, and perceived as an independent activity within the ESP process. The first chapter provides a short general overview of the nature of ESP testing field, bringing into focus that ESP testing has been concerned with measuring specific uses of English language among identified groups of test takers. Next, some defining characteristics and principles common to all ESP tests are explored. The factors of authenticity and washback effect in ESP testing are examined in greater detail. Next, the importance of quality assessment is stressed, and ways of achieving it are examined. The chapter on the English Vocational Matura outlines the format of this ESP public examination in Slovenia, examining the tasks of reading and writing in at greater length.

HTML | PDF

 

Dealing with Situations of Positive and Negative Washback

 

ABSTRACT: The article deals with the complexity of a washback phenomenon in language testing. It focuses on its positive effects within an institution as well as on the situations of negative washback. Washback is presented as a stimulus for a change and as a bridge for efficient communication between teachers and testers. Certain changes as a result of positive washback point at the opportunities which a testing institution has when it organizes, designs and administers criterion-referenced tests.

 

The complexity of washback is confirmed when the teachers' perspective is discussed. Teacher-tester relationship and the lack of teacher insight into testing may contribute to negative washback. Within this frame, concrete situations are described and lessons learned are summarized. In the conclusion, the teachers and testers are reminded of professional and ethical standards and of their responsibility towards their clients, students and test takers.

HTML | PDF