|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Articles |
:: We welcome articles that draw on
experience with new LSP methods, materials, means of assessment and
other areas of professional interest as well as practical applications
of LSP description or analysis. Articles describing carefully planned
and executed experiments in the field of LSP are also welcome. |
| :: Articles should seek to balance
theory
and practice by ensuring that practical descriptions relate to
underlying theoretical principles and theoretical concepts to their
practical applications. They should show awareness of recent work
carried out in the area on which they report. |
|
| :: Articles can be written in
English,
German, Italian, French, Spanish or Slovene, i.e. in the language that
the article focuses on. |
|
| :: The list of sources should contain
only
key references (not more than 15). |
|
| :: Articles should be preferably 3000
words long and should not exceed 4000 words. Please give your word
count at the end. |
|
| :: Articles should include an
abstract in
English of 120 - 150 words in length, keywords (up to six), and a
summary of about 400 words
summarizing the main points in Slovene. The Editorial Board of the
journal will provide the summaries in Slovene for authors from other
countries. |
|
| Reviews |
:: Please contact the editor if you
are
interested in writing a review for Scripta Manent (see the e-mail
address at the end of the guidelines). |
| :: Reviews of individual books or
software
should be maximum 1200 words long, while comparative reviews of books
or software should not exceed 2000 words. |
|
| Readers
Respond |
:: We invite readers to contribute
their
own reactions to a specific article published in a recent issue of Scripta
Manent. |
| :: Submissions should not exceed 1000
words. |
| Submissions |
:: Only e-mail submissions are
accepted.
Send your manuscript as an attachment in one of the following formats:
Plain Text (*.txt), Rich Text Format (*.rtf), Open Office (*.odt),
Corel WordPerfect (*.wpd) or Microsoft Word (*.doc), the file bearing
your own name, e.g. <yourname.txt>. The body of your e-mail
should contain your full name, postal and e-mail address, telephone
number and the title of your article. |
| :: Please use font 12 throughout the
article and do not apply text styles. Use capital letters for the title
and underlined letters for headings. No reference should be made to you
as the author. |
|
| :: Illustrations (tables, diagrams,
etc.)
should be included in separate files and clearly identified as e.g.
Table 1, Figure 1, etc. Please use one of the following formats: .jpg
or .gif. |
|
| :: All submissions should be
proofread. |
|
| Citations,
References |
:: All contributions to the journal
should
comply with the APA style. |
| :: When making references in
the
text of your manuscript to other publications, please refer to the
author's name and year of publication, e.g. "Bhatia (1993) alludes to
the possibility of". Quotations should additionally be followed by page
numbers, e.g. (Douglas, 2000: 248-49). |
|
| :: The list of references
should be
arranged in alphabetic order by author's names following the style of
the examples below: Curado-Fuentes, A. (2002). Tasks for Business Science and Technology English: Evaluating Corpus-driven Data for ESP. English for Specific Purposes World, 1(1) [online]. Available: http://esp-world.7p.com/Articles_1/issue_1.html (7 July 2004). Flowerdew, J. and M. Peacock. (2001). Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hunston, S. (2001) Colligation, Lexis, Pattern, and Text. In M. Scott and G. Thompson (Eds.), Patterns of Text (pp. 13-33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Johns, A. M. (2002). Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum. Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12(1), 3-22. |
|
| Reviewing
Process |
:: Step 1: The editor and the
Editorial
Board first review each submission received to see if it meets the
basic requirements for publication in the journal and if it is of
sufficient quality to meet the standards of Scripta Manent.
Authors of manuscripts are notified by e-mail as to whether their
submission has been sent out for blind review or, if not, why not. |
| :: Step 2: All submissions that meet
the
basic requirements for publication are blind reviewed by two members of
the Editorial Board or external reviewers. |